SurferCloud Blog SurferCloud Blog
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Latest Events
    • Product Updates
    • Service announcement
  • TUTORIAL
  • COMPARISONS
  • INDUSTRY INFORMATION
  • Telegram Group
SurferCloud Blog SurferCloud Blog
SurferCloud Blog SurferCloud Blog
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Latest Events
    • Product Updates
    • Service announcement
  • TUTORIAL
  • COMPARISONS
  • INDUSTRY INFORMATION
  • Telegram Group
  • banner shape
  • banner shape
  • banner shape
  • banner shape
  • plus icon
  • plus icon

SurferCloud vs. Vultr, DigitalOcean, and Linode: CPU Benchmark and Pricing Comparison

October 8, 2024
2 minutes
COMPARISONS
441 Views

When choosing a VPS provider, two critical factors to consider are CPU performance and pricing. Below, we compare SurferCloud against well-known providers such as Vultr, DigitalOcean, and Linode based on CPU benchmark tests and cost-effectiveness.

Get Started: 📢Special offers: best Linux/Windows VPS starts at $1/mo-SurferCloud

SurferCloud vs. Vultr, DigitalOcean, and Linode: CPU Benchmark and Pricing Comparison

CPU Benchmark Performance

The CPU performance test was conducted using the Coremark benchmark tool, which measures the performance of processors in single-core (1C) and multi-core (4C) environments. Let's look at the results:

Coremark-1C (Single-Core Performance)

  • SurferCloud: 17,563
  • Vultr: 14,781
  • DigitalOcean: 14,329
  • Linode: 9,227

SurferCloud outperforms all competitors in single-core performance, scoring 17,563. This is significantly higher than Vultr (14,781) and DigitalOcean (14,329), making it a strong contender for CPU-intensive tasks that rely on single-core efficiency.

Coremark-4C (Multi-Core Performance)

  • SurferCloud: 67,518
  • Vultr: 57,069
  • DigitalOcean: 53,485
  • Linode: 33,649

In multi-core performance, SurferCloud again takes the lead with a score of 67,518. It demonstrates a clear advantage over Vultr (57,069) and DigitalOcean (53,485). This makes SurferCloud an excellent option for applications that require strong multi-core performance, such as database hosting or heavy computational tasks.

Pricing Comparison

Now let’s examine how these providers compare in terms of cost, based on the specifications of 2GB memory and NVMe storage options:

  • SurferCloud: 2GB Memory, 40GB NVMe Disk, priced at $2.9/month (discounted from $7.5/month)
  • Vultr: 2GB Memory, 50GB NVMe Disk, priced at $12/month
  • DigitalOcean: 2GB Memory, 50GB NVMe Disk, priced at $12/month
  • Linode: 2GB Memory, 50GB NVMe Disk, priced at $12/month

SurferCloud offers the most affordable option, significantly undercutting its competitors with a price of just $2.9 per month (discounted from $7.5/month). In contrast, Vultr, DigitalOcean, and Linode all charge $12 per month for a similar setup.

Conclusion

When comparing CPU performance and pricing, SurferCloud stands out as the best choice for users seeking high-performance VPS hosting at a lower cost. It outperforms Vultr, DigitalOcean, and Linode in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks while being far more budget-friendly with its aggressive pricing. If you’re looking for a cost-effective VPS solution without compromising on performance, SurferCloud is a top contender.

Tags : and Linode: CPU Benchmark and Pricing Comparison DigitalOcean Linode SurferCloud SurferCloud Pricing SurferCloud vs. Vultr vps pricing Vultr

Related Post

4 minutes COMPARISONS

PHP vs JavaScript: Which Programming Language

Choosing the right programming language for a web devel...

6 minutes COMPARISONS

UEFI vs BIOS: Understanding the Key Differenc

When it comes to booting up your computer, you may have...

7 minutes COMPARISONS

EC2 vs VPS: Which is the Best Option for Your

When considering cloud hosting solutions, businesses an...

Affordable CDN

ucdn

2025 Special Offers:

annual vps

Light Server promotion:

ulhost-promo

Cloud Server promotion:

cloud server

Copyright © 2024 SurferCloud All Rights Reserved.  Sitemap.